Looking at the wiki page for Leeds West, the constituency in which I live, I come across a profound miscalculation - it states that John Battle (Labour) was returned with 55.5% of the vote.
This is profoundly wrong and misleading - this is only based on the number of people positively voting for labour out of the total turnout, as if those who decided not to vote somehow do not matter. If you weigh in the total number of available votes the figure looks considerably less impressive: 29.73%.
Less than a third of my fellow constituents returned the Labour party to power of their own volition at the last election.
Less than one in three people brought Labour back to power in Leeds West; less than a quarter brought them back country-wide at the last election - one in 4 people have empowered the Labour party to bring this country to its knees intentionally!
And all because 46.4% of you wouldn't, or couldn't, vote for those in power in my constituency.
There are 2 fatal flaws with democracy - the first comes when people stop voting consciously, allowing bad decisions to be made by flawed people; they cry "voting changes nothing" and make it true because nobody they deem to protect our laws is changed - that is how this present autocracy can rule with a mandate of 1 in 4 people. The second comes when those self-same flawed MP's foolishly forget that their primary job is not to create laws (bad or good) but to uphold just ones instead; I believe that if LPUK is ever to achieve any real positive change in this country it must not forget this; that we champion the individualist, and by association, laws that let him thrive, above all else.
It is my hope that at the next election - whether that be in 2 or 18 months time, depending on who you believe - I will stand for Leeds West as LPUK's PPC; I have just forwarded my details on to the coordinators to start the ball rolling. In the interim I ask the following:
- If you dont vote, do: if you yourself, or anyone you know, doesn't vote, please do - I am not suggesting you vote for a party you hold only contempt for - in that case vote for all of them; I will be doing so in the upcoming Euro-elections; would the winning party be able to hold any kind of valid mandate if the number of spoiled votes was greater than what brought them into power? Look at it another way - you vote by proxy for the winning party when you do not vote at all.
- If you do not vote because you believe that voting changes nothing, it is because you have voted away too many of your freedoms? I recommend you watch the following videos to understand this; your rights and freedoms aren't given by government - they are yours, and the government exists to serve them and you - anything more, and as we are fast seeing, we become slaves to it. LPUK came into existence to ensure this fact isn't forgotten and government is put into its rightful place, championing liberty, not granting it.
Running a campaign for election is expensive; there are several candidates for LPUK so if you are interested in helping please donate here:
Better yet, join up to make a positive change for Britain:
And if you think you know someone who doesn't vote - tell them about LPUK, show them the website if you have any of the business cards hand them out:
Libertarians believe in individual liberty, personal responsibility, and freedom from government—on all issues at all times. We don't say government is too big in one area, but then in another area push for a law to force people to do what we want. We believe in individual liberty, personal responsibility, and freedom from government—on all issues at all times.
LPUK: a party that speaks for the silent majority.
Cross posted here
2 comments:
'One in 4 people have empowered the Labour party to bring this country to its knees intentionally!'
Do you mean that labour voters intended to bring this country to its knees or that labour did? Both of these are clearly false.
'Their primary job is not to create laws (bad or good) but to uphold just ones instead'
No it isn't, that's for the judiciary surely.
"Do you mean that labour voters intended to bring this country to its knees or that labour did? Both of these are clearly false."
I mean (and, mea culpa, it is entirely down to a quirk of my use of the written english language, i.e. badly) that 1 in 4 people have empowered Labour to their current position of looters-in-chief; their actions have led to this country being brought to its knees; intentionally or not is up to the conspiracy theorists of which I am not.
'Their primary job is not to create laws (bad or good) but to uphold just ones instead'
No it isn't, that's for the judiciary surely.
No; the job of the judiciary is to uphold all laws irrespective of whether we deem them to be unfair - when we see an unjust law we must put people in parliament to change those laws; judicial activism is perhaps the most obvious symptom of our loss of sovereignty as a nation - judges are able to make the rules up as they please in favour of international rules over national ones - whether the rule is right or wrong is not important; they are merely the arbiters of it, not its commanders.
Post a Comment